Dear friends and colleagues, Please see below a statement from the Ei Tu Hta Internally Displaced Person Supporting Committee endorsed by 108 civil society organizations in Myanmar regarding the Myanmar Government's recent announcement that it plans to close down IDP camps in conflict ridden areas throughout Myanmar - a plan that is being pursued without the participation of the affected communities. Apologies for any cross-posting. In solidarity, Aung Khaing Min
Executive Director
Progressive Voice
info@progressive-voice.org _______________________________________ Burma Government Must Address Root Causes of Decades-long Civil War Before Discussion of IDP Return 25 June 2018 By Ei Tu Hta Internally Displaced Person Supporting Committee The decades-long offensives waged against ethnic nationalities by the Burmese military has created a humanitarian crisis in Burma. The overwhelming number of internally displaced people (IDPs) and refugees from Karen, Kachin, Shan and Rakhine States are the direct consequence of the ongoing conflict, coupled with the widespread and systematic human rights violations that continue to be committed by the Burmese military. Given the lack of comprehensive political dialogue, the limited and largely cosmetic political changes since the initiation of the peace process six years ago and the recent deadlock in the peace negotiations, we the undersigned raise grave concerns regarding the Burmese government's recent announcement that it plans to close down IDP camps in conflict ridden areas throughout Burma - a plan that is being pursued without the participation of the affected communities. The announcement to close down the IDP camps in Karen, Kachin, Shan and Rakhine States comes on the heels of the recent breach of the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA) by the Burmese military in Karen State where over 2,400 people were once again forced to flee into the jungle as a result of resumed conflict, and are likely to remain there throughout the monsoon season without aid. Pregnant women have been forced to give birth in the jungle as children and elderly remain vulnerable without food, education and health care. This aggressive move by the Burmese military could possibly trigger a new cycle of displacement in Karen State, forcing additional civilians to leave their homes once again. In addition, as Kachin State saw its seventh year since the resumption of war, the number of those displaced in Kachin State alone has risen to over 120,000 people. Kachin State has seen one of its worst offensives by the Burmese military recently, as they indiscriminately conducted heavy artillery and aerial bombings of nearby civilian areas and IDP camps. The Burmese military has continued to display complete disregard for international human rights and humanitarian law as over 7,000 IDPs have taken shelter in existing and new IDP camps in northern Burma since March 2018, while hundreds remain stuck in active conflict areas. To forge on with the recently announced "National Strategy for the closure of IDP camps in Myanmar" under these circumstances will lead to forcible resettlement and risk of secondary displacement upon return or resettlement, further endangering the lives of those who are already extremely vulnerable. Before any return or resettlement of IDPs can be discussed, root causes of conflict must be addressed. This includes holding the Burmese military accountable for their violations of the NCA in addition to the decades of human right violations perpetrated against ethnic nationalities. In addition, the Burma government must observe the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement, and as such the return of IDPs must be voluntarily, in safety and with dignity. This requires that IDPs and affected communities are ensured full participation in the discussion, planning and management of the IDPs possible return, resettlement and reintegration without which return cannot be sustainable. In addition, the role of ethnic organizations who have supported the IDPs for decades must also be recognized. It is imperative that they are consulted in all discussions involving the return of IDPs as they are best placed to provide essential services and support upon their return. Despite the increasing cuts to food and provision of education and health services in Ei Tu Hta IDP camp, as well as Shan IDP and refugee camps along the Thailand-Burma border since 2017, the majority of the IDPs have remained in the camps as conflict continues to intensify throughout Burma. Thus, concern should be placed, not on the return or resettlement of IDPs, but on provision of aid and allowing international organizations access to IDPs who fear for their safety upon their return and rely on the IDP camps for safety and security. Another concern facing returning IDPs is the potential for conflict upon resettlement due to the lack of available space, land, natural resources and livelihood opportunities, especially given the widespread land confiscation that has taken place since the signing of the ceasefire in 2012. The "National Strategy for the closure of IDP camps in Myanmar" is premature and shortsighted. It does not address the root causes of displacement while closure of the camps has the real risk of endangering civilians and causing secondary displacement. We urge the Burma government to: - Immediately halt all plans involving closure of IDP camps in ethnic areas
- Respect the rights of IDPs and affected communities and ensure that all discussions, planning and management of IDP return or resettlement include their full participation and consultation
- Ensure that all IDPs have access to humanitarian aid in accordance with international humanitarian law and allows for unimpeded access to all humanitarian aid organizations
- Recognize and respect local organizations, particularly ethnic organizations, and their agency and role in delivering aid to the IDPs in their respective areas
We urge the Burmese Military to: - Immediately cease all military offensives and withdraw troops from ethnic areas
- Build trust by genuinely engaging with the peace process
- Ensure that all IDPs have access to humanitarian aid in accordance with international humanitarian law and allows for unimpeded access to all humanitarian aid organizations
Executive Board Ei Tu Hta IDP Supporting Committee + 66 879 4387 50 Endorsed organizations: 1. Karen Peace Support Network (KPSN) 2. Karen Women Organization (KWO) 3. Karen Refugee Committee (KRC) 4. Karen Environmental and Social Action Network (KESAN) 5. Karen Teacher Working Group (KTWG) 6. Karen Education Department (KED) 7. Karen Office of Relief and Development (KORD) 8. Karen River Watch (KRW) 9. Karen Affairs Committee (KAC) 10. Karen Human Rights Group (KHRG) 11. Karen State Civil Society Organization Network (KSCN) 12. Karen Student Network Group (KSNG) 13. Karen Youth Organization (KYO) 14. Tarkapaw Youth Group 15. Tanintharyi Friends 16. Committee for Internally Displaced Karen Peoples (CIDKP) 17. Burma Medical Association (BMA) 18. Back Pack Health Worker Team (BPHWT) 19. Mae Tao Clinic 20. Thwee Community Development Network (TCDN) 21. Hsar Mu Htaw CSO 22. Youth Circle (YC) 23. Mutraw Community Development Committee (MCDC) 24. ရြက္စိမ္းႏု သဘာဝပတ္ဝန္းက်င္ထိန္းသိမ္းေရးအဖဲြ႕ 25. Action Group for Farmer Affair (AGFA) (Ayayarwaddy Division) 26. Action Group for Farmer Affair (AGFA) (Magway Division) 27. Action Group for Farmer Affair (AGFA) (Pagu Division) 28. Action Group for Farmer Affair (AGFA) (Sagaing Division) 29. Action Group for Farmers Affair (AGFA) (Mandalay Division) 30. All Kachin Youth Union 31. Asiochin Independence force. 32. AWDO (Naphe) 33. Ayearwady west Development Organization.AWDO (Magway, 9th township) 34. Ayeyarwaddy Transparency and Accountability Association (ATTA) 35. Bedar Social Development Group 36. Belinn CSO Network 37. Candle Light 38. Chin Women Development Organization 39. Chin Youth Organization (Matupi) 40. Communiry Develovment Association 41. Green Network Mergui Archipelago 42. Htoi Gender and Development Foundation 43. Human Right Foundation of Mon Land (HURFOM) 44. K'Cho Land Development Associatuon 45. Kachin and Research Center Reply 46. Kachin Development and Networking Group (KDNG) 47. Kachin Educational Foundation (KEF) 48. Kachin State Youth Assembly 49. Kachin State Youth Association 50. Kachin Women Union (KWN) 51. Kan Chay Arr Mann fishery development network (Nga Yoke Kaung) 52. Kanpetlet Land Development Association 53. Matu Forum Committee 54. Mon Area Community Development Organization (MACDO) 55. Mon Youth Progressive Organiztion (MYPO) 56. MRJ (မာယာဂ်ာအဖြဲ႔) 57. Myeik Lawyer Network 58. NeT organization 59. Open Development Foundation 60. Peace and Justice 61. Pwinphyu Development Organization (PDO) 62. Ram Rawt (YRDO - Youth Resources Development Organisation ) 63. Saytana Shaesaung Youth Organization 64. Saytodetayar Development Organization. SDO) 65. Shwe Thinkha Social Development Organization 66. Southern Youth 67. Thanbyuzayart Mon Youth 68. The Seagull 69. Yomachin (saytodetaya) 70. Youth Recure (Ramhkye) 71. ကလ်ာဏမိတၲလူမႈဖြံ႔ျဖိဳးေရးအသင္း (ခင္ဦး) 72. ကေလးသူငယ္ကာကြယ္ေစာင့္ေ႐ွက္ေရး ကြန္ယက္ 73. ဂ႐ုဏာ႐ွင္ နာေရးကူညီေရးအဖြဲ႔ 74. SarPhyu Famar Network 75. စိမ္းေရာင္စို (တံတားဦး) 76. ဇင္လြန္းေကာ္မတီ (တန္ဖရဲ႕) 77. တို႔မ်ိဳးဆက္ကြန္ရက္ 78. ဓမၼအလင္း ယဥ္ေက်းလိမၼာအဖြဲ႔ 79. Pan Tain Shin Women Rural Development Orgalization 80. Pan Tain Shin Rural Development Orgalization 81. ပ်ိဳးဥယ်ာဥ္ ပညာေရး အေထာက္အကူျပဳအဖြဲ႔ 82. မတူအမ်ိဳးသမီးဖြံ႔ျဖိဳးေရးအဖြဲ႔ 83. Muditar Organization 84. ရည္ရြယ္ရာ လူမႈဖြံ႔ၿဖိဳးေရးအဖြဲ႔ 85. Lin lake Kyal Social Development Organization 86. လပြတၱာေတာင္သူလယ္သမားသမဂၢ 87. Future Star Youth Organization 88. အလင္းတန္းလူမူဖြံ႔ၿဖိဳးေရးအဖြဲ႔(ဘိုကေလး) 89. အလင္းမီးအိမ္ 90. အလင္းသီတံ 91. ဧရာ-သလႅာအဖြဲ႔ 92. ဧရာဝတီတိုင္းေတာင္သူလယ္သမားသမဂၢ 93. ေတာင္ပိုင္းလူငယ္ဖြံ႕ျဖိဳးအဖြဲ႕ 94. ေတာင္သူလယ္သမားသမဂၢ (ကန္႔ဘလူျမိဳ႕နယ္) 95. Regional Development Organization 96. Paungsee Myittar Organization 97. ေျမယာႏွင့္ပတ္ဝန္းက်င္ထိန္းသိမ္း အဖဲြ႔၊ ကြတ္ခိုင္ၿမိဳ႕နယ္ 98. Young Ni Oo Social Development Organization 99. Young Ni Oo Women Group 100. ေရႊျခေသ့ၤလူမႈေစာင့္ေရွာက္ေရးအသင္း 101. ေရႊျခေသ့ၤေတာင္သူကြန္ရက္ 102. CAFT Citizen Action for Transparency 103. Generation Wave 104. MCRS Myanmar Cultural Research Society 105. Burma Monitor 106. COMREG 107. Pace on Peaceful pluralism 108. Progressive Voice
Download this statement in English HERE.
______________________________________________________________________________________ ျမန္မာအစိုးရအေနျဖင့္ ဒုကၡသည္မ်ားေနရပ္ျပန္ေရးေဆြးေႏြးမႈမျပဳမီ ဆယ္စုႏွစ္မ်ားစြာရွည္ၾကာလွ်က္ရွိေသာျပည္တြင္းစစ္၏အဓိကေၾကာင္း အရာအေပၚတြင္အေလးထားေဆာင္ရြက္ရန္ ၂၀၁၈ ခုႏွစ္ ဇြန္လ ၂၅ ရက္ အီးတူထ ျပည္တြင္းေနရပ္စြန္႔ခြာလူထုကူညီပံ့ပုိးေရးေကာ္မတီ ျမန္မာစစ္တပ္မွ တိုင္းရင္းသားလူမ်ိဳးစုမ်ားအေပၚ ထုိးစစ္ဆင္ေနမႈမွာ ဆယ္စုႏွစ္ေပါင္းမ်ားစြာ ရွည္ၾကာ လွ်က္ရွိေနၿပီျဖစ္ၿပီး ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံတြင္ လူသားခ်င္းစာနာမႈဆိုင္ရာ ျပႆနာမ်ားႏွင့္ရင္ဆိုင္ေနရသည္။ ကရင္၊ ကခ်င္၊ ရွမ္းႏွင့္ ရခိုင္ျပည္နယ္တုိ႔တြင္ ျပည္တြင္းေနရပ္စြန္႔ခြာရသူ(IDP)မ်ားႏွင ့္ ဒုကၡသည္မ်ားပ်ံ႕ႏ႔ေံွ နမသႈ ည္ ဆက္တိုက ္ ျဖစ္ပြားလွ်က္ရိွေသာ ပဋိပကၡမ်ားႏွင့္အတ ူ ျမန္မာစစ္တပ္မ ွ လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးခ်ိဳးေဖာက္ေနမႈမ်ားက ို က်ယ္က်ယ ္ ျပန္႔ျပန္႔ႏွင့္စနစ္တက်က်ဴးလြန္ေနျခင္း၏ တိုက္ရိုက္အက်ိဳးဆက္မ်ားေၾကာင့္ ျဖစ္သည္။ အျပဳသေဘာ ေဆာင္ေသာ ႏိုင္ငံေရးေဆြးေႏြးပြဲမ်ား လုပ္ေဆာင္ႏုိင္ျခင္း မရွိေသာေၾကာင့္ လြန္ခဲ့ေသာ (၆) ႏွစ္တာကာလအတြင္း စတင္ခဲ့ေသာ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးျဖစစ္ ဥ္သည ္ အကန႔အ္ သတမ္ ်ားႏွင ့္အေပၚယံသာျဖစ္ခဲ့ၿပီး ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးေဆြးေႏြးပြဲမ်ား ေရွ႕ဆက္သြားႏိုင္ရန္ တစ္ဆို႔ေနလွ်က္ရွိသည့္ လက္ရွိအေျခအေနတြင္ ျမန္မာအစိုးရမွ ပဋိပကၡ၏ဆိုးက်ိဳးသက္ ေရာက္မႈခံစားေနရသူမ်ားအား ထည့္သြင္းပါ၀င္ေစမႈမရွိခဲ့ေသာ အစီအစဥ္မွတစ္ဆင့္ တစ္ႏို္င္ငံလံုးရွိ ပဋိပကၡျဖစ္ ပြားေနသည့္ ေဒသမ်ားတြင္ရွိေနေသာ IDP စခန္းမ်ားအားလံုးကုိ ပိတ္သိမ္းမည္ဆုိသည့္ ျမန္မာအစိုးရ၏ ေၾကညာခ်က္အေပၚ ေအာက္ပါလက္မွတ္ထိုးထားေသာ မိမိတို႔အဖြဲ႔အစည္းမ်ားမွ အလြန္အမင္း စိုးရိမ္မိပါသည္။ ကရင္၊ ကခ်င္၊ ရွမ္းႏွင့္ ရခုိင္ျပည္နယ္မ်ားထဲတြင္ရွိေသာ IDP မ်ား လက္ရွိေနထိုင္ေနလွ်က္ရွိေသာစခန္းမ်ား ပိတ္သိမ္းမည့္ေၾကညာခ်က္သည္ ျမန္မာစစ္တပ္မွ တစ္ႏိုင္ငံလံုးပစ္ခတ္တိုက္ခတ္မႈရပ္စဲေရးသေဘာတူ စာခ်ဳပ္(NCA)ကို ခ်ိဳးေဖာက္ျခင္းေၾကာင့္ ကရင္ျပည္နယ္အတြင္း ျဖစ္ပြားခဲ့ေသာ တစ္ေက်ာ့ျပန္ပဋိပကၡေနာက္ ဆက္တဲြအျဖစ္ ဒုကၡသည္ေပါင္း (၂,၄၀၀) ေက်ာ္ ေတာတြင္းသို႔ ထပ္မံထြက္ေျပးတိမ္းေရွာင္ခဲ့ရေသာ အေျခခံမွစ တင္ခဲ့ၿပီး ထုိဒုကၡသည္မ်ားသည္ မိုးရာသီတစ္ေလွ်ာက္လံုး မည္သည့္အကူအညီမွမရဘဲ ေတာထဲတြင္ဆက္လက္ ေနထိုင္ရမည့္ အေျခအေနႏွင့္ ရင္ဆိုင္ေနရပါသည္။ ကိုယ္၀န္ေဆာင္အမ်ိဳးသမီမ်ားမွာ ေတာထဲတြင္ ကေလးေမြး ဖြားေနရၿပီး ကေလးသူငယ္မ်ားႏွင့္ သက္ႀကီးရြယ္အိုမ်ားအတြက္ အစားအေသာက္၊ ပညာေရးႏွင့္က်န္းမာေရး ေစာင့္ေရွာက္မႈအေျခအေနမွာ စိုးရိမ္ဖြယ္ရာ ျဖစ္ေနသည္။ ျမန္မာစစ္တပ္၏ မတရားက်ဴးေက်ာ္မႈမ်ားသည္ ကရင္ ျပည္နယ္အတြင္း ေနရပ္စြန္႔ခြာရမႈအသစ္တစ္ဖန္ ျပည္လည္ျဖစ္ပြားရန္ ေမာင္းတင္ထားသကဲသို႔ျဖစ္ၿပီး ျပည္သူ မ်ားအား ထပ္မံေနရပ္စြန္႔ခြာရေစမည့္ အေျခအေနသို႔ တြန္းပို႔ေနပါသည္။ ထို႔ျပင္ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္အတြင္း ျပည္တြင္းစစ္ တစ္ေက်ာ့ျပန္လည္ျဖစ္ပြားသည့္(၇)ႏွစ္တာ ကာလအတြင္းကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္ တစ္ခုတည္းတြင္ပင္ IDP ဦးေရးေပါင္း(၁၂၀,၀၀၀)ေက်ာ္အထိ တိုးျမွင့္လာခဲ့သည္။ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္အေနျဖင့္ မၾကာေသးမီ အခ်ိန္ကာလမွစတင္ကာ ျမန္မာစစ္တပ္၏အရွိန္ျမႇင့္ထိုးစစ္ဆင္ေနမႈမ်ားကို ျပင္း ထန္စြာရင္ဆိုင္ေနရၿပီး ေဒသခံျပည္သူမ်ားႏွင့္ IDP မ်ားေနထိုင္ရာ စခန္းမ်ားအနီးတြင္ လက္နက္ႀကီးျဖင့္ ပစ္ခတ္ျခင္း၊ ေလေၾကာင္းမွဗံုးႀကဲျခင္းမ်ားကို လက္လြတ္စပယ္ လုပ္ေဆာင္မႈမ်ားလည္း ရွိေနသည္။ ျမန္မာစစ္တပ္အေနျဖင ့္ ႏိုင္ငံတကာလ႔အူ ခြငအ္ ေရးႏွင ့္ လူသားခ်င္းစာနာမႈဆိုင္ရာဥပေဒအား လုံး၀အသိအမွတ္ျပဳျခင္းမရိွသည ့္ လုပ ္ေဆာင္ေနမႈမ်ားေၾကာင့္ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံေျမာက္ပိုင္းတြင္ ၂၀၁၈ ခုႏွစ္ မတ္လမွစတင္ကာ ျပည္တြင္းေနရပ္စြန္႔ခြာရသူ (၇,၀၀၀)ေက်ာ္မွာ မူလစခန္းမ်ားႏွင့္စခန္းသစ္မ်ားတြင္ ခိုလံႈေနရဆဲျဖစ္ၿပီး ရာေပါင္းမ်ားစြာမွာလည္း ပဋိပကၡမ်ား အၾကားတြင္ ပိတ္မိေနဆဲ ျဖစ္ပါသည္။ IDP မ်ား၏ စခန္းမ်ားကိုပိတ္သိမ္းရန္ လက္တေလာထုတ္ျပန္ထားသည့္ေၾကညာခ်က္အား ႏုိင္ငံေတာ္စီမံ ကိန္းတစ္ရပ္အေနျဖင့္ ဖိအားေပးလုပ္ေဆာင္လာပါက ထိုေနရပ္ျပန္ေရးႏွင့္ ျပန္လည္ေနရာခ်ထား ေရးစီမံကိန္းတြင္ IDP မ်ားအဖို႔ အတင္းအဓမၼျပန္လည္ေနရာခ်ထားေရးႏွင့္ ေနာက္တစ္ႀကိမ္ေျပာင္းေရႊ႕ရျခင္း စိန္ေခၚမႈမ်ားကို ႀကံဳေတြ႔ရမည္ျဖစ္ၿပီး အလြန္စိုးရိမ္ဖြယ္ရာအတိျဖစ္ေနသည့္ ၎တို႔၏ လက္ရွိအေျခအေနမ်ားကို ေဘးအႏၱရာယ္ထပ္မံႀကံဳေတြ႔ေစမည္သာ ျဖစ္သည္။ IDP မ်ားအတြက္ ေနရပ္ျပန္ေရးႏွင့္ ျပန္လည္ေနရာခ်ထားေရးမေဆြးေႏြးမီ ပဋိပကၡျဖစ္ပြားရျခင္း၏ အေျခခံအေၾကာင္းအရင္းမ်ားကို ဦးစားေပးေဆြးေႏြး လုပ္ေဆာင္သင့္ပါသည္။ ထိုအထဲတြင္ ျမန္မာစစ္တပ္၏ NCA အေပၚခ်ိဳးေဖာက္မႈႏွင့္ ဆယ္စုႏွစ္မ်ားစြာ တိုင္းရင္းသားလူမ်ိဳးစုမ်ားအေပၚက်ဴးလြန္ခဲ့ေသာ လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးခ်ိဳးေဖာက္မႈမ်ားအတြက္ တာ၀န္ယူမႈ၊တာဝန္ခံမႈရွိသည့္ အခ်က္မ်ား ပါ၀င္ရမည္။ ၎အျပင္ အစိုးရအေနျဖင့္ျပည္တြင္းေနရပ္စြန္႔ခြာရသူမ်ားလမ္းညႊန္အား အသိအမွတ္ျပဳၿပီး ျပည္တြင္းေနရပ္စြန္႔ခြာရသူမ်ား ျပန္လာရာတြင္၎တုိ႔ဆႏၵအေလ်ာက္ျဖစ္ရမည္ျဖစ္ၿပီ ဘ၀လံုၿခံဳမႈႏွင့္ဂုဏ္သိကၡာရွိရန္ လုပ္ေဆာင္ေပးရမည္ ျဖစ္သည္။ ထိုသို႔ေဆာင္ရြက္ရာတြင္ IDP မ်ားႏွင့္ ပဋိပကၡ၏ဆိုးက်ိဳးသက္ေရာက္မႈမ်ားကို ခံစားေနရသည့္လူထုအသိုင္းအဝိုင္းမ်ားမွအျပည့္အ၀ပါ၀င္မႈရွိေသာ ေဆြးေႏြးမႈမ်ား၊ ျဖစ္ႏုိင္ေခ်ရွိေသာ IDP မ်ားေနရပ္ျပန္ေရးစီစဥ္ေရးဆြဲမႈႏွင့္စီမံကြပ္ကဲမႈမ်ား၊ ျပန္လည္ေနရာခ်ထားမႈႏွင့္ ျပန္လည္ေပါင္းစည္းေနထိုင္မႈမ်ား လုပ္ေဆာင္ရန္လုိအပ္ၿပီး ၎တို႔ပါ၀င္မႈမရွိေသာ ေနရပ္ျပန္မည့္အစီအစဥ္မ်ားသည္ ေရရွည္တည္တံ့မည္ မဟုတ္ေပ။ ထို႔ျပင္ ျပည္တြင္းေနရပ္စြန္႔ခြာရသူမ်ားကို ဆယ္စုႏွစ္မ်ားစြာ ကူညီေပးေနသည့္ တိုင္းရင္းသားအဖြဲ႔အစည္းမ်ား၏ အခန္းက႑မ်ားကိုလည္း အသိအမွတ္ျပဳေပးရမည္ျဖစ္သည္။ ၎တို႔သည္သာလွ်င္ ေနရပ္ျပန္ရာတြင္ လိုအပ္သည့္၀န္ေဆာင္မႈမ်ားႏွင့္အေထာက္အပံ့မ်ားကို ေဖာ္ေဆာင္ေပးႏိုင္ေသာေၾကာင့္ ေတြ႔ဆံုေဆြးေႏြးညႇိႏႈိင္းမႈတုိင္းတြင္ ၎တို႔ႏွင့္မျဖစ္မေနေတြ႔ဆံုေဆြးေႏြးရန္ လုိအပ္ေပသည္။ ထို႔အျပင္ ၂၀၁၇ ခုႏွစ္မွ စတင္ကာ အီးတူးထာ IDP စခန္းတြင္ စားနပ္ရိကၡာႏွင့္ပညာေရး၊ က်န္းမာေရး ၀န္ေဆာင္မႈအစီအမံမ်ားအေပၚ ျဖတ္ေတာက္မႈမ်ား ျမင့္မားလာသကဲ့သို႔ ထိုင္း-ျမန္မာ နယ္စပ္တစ္ေလွ်ာက္ရွိ IDP စခန္းမ်ားႏွင့္ ဒုကၡသည္စခန္းမ်ားတြင္ ေနထုိင္ေနသည့္ ရွမ္းဒုကၡသည္အမ်ားစုမွာလည္း ျပည္တြင္းပဋိပကၡမ်ား ပိုမိုႀကီးထြားလာေသာေၾကာင့္ ေနရပ္ျပန္ေရးမစဥ္းစားႏုိင္ဘဲ စခန္းမ်ားတြင္ ဆက္လက္ခုိလံႈေနရဆဲျဖစ္သည္။ ထို႔ေၾကာင့္ ဒုကၡသည္မ်ားႏွင့္ IDP မ်ားေနရပ္ျပန္ေရးႏွင့္ျပန္လည္ေနရာခ်ထားေရးကို ဦးစားေပးလုပ္ေဆာင္ျခင္းထက္၎တို႔အတြက္ အေထာက္အပံ့ရရွိႏိုင္ေရး စီမံေဆာင္ရြက္မႈမ်ားႏွင့္အတူ လံုၿခံဳေရးအေျခအေနေၾကာင့္ ေနရပ္ျပန္ ရန္ေၾကာက္ရြံ႕ေနရၿပီး ဘ၀လံုျခံဳမႈႏွင့္လံုၿခံဳေရးအေျခအေနမ်ားအရ IDP စခန္းမ်ားတြင္ မွီခိုေနထုိင္ လွ်က္ရွိေသာသူမ်ားကို ႏိုင္ငံတကာအဖြဲ႔အစည္းမ်ားႏွင့္ေတြ႔ဆံုႏုိင္ရန္ ဦးစားေပးလုပ္ေဆာင္ေပးသင့္သည္။ ေနရပ္ျပန္မည့္ ျပည္တြင္းေနရပ္စြန္႔ခြာသူမ်ားႀကံဳေတြ႔ေနရေသာ အျခားစိုးရိမ္မႈမ်ားမွာ ျပန္လည္ေနရာခ် ထားရာတြင္ ႀကံဳေတြ႔လာႏိုင္ဖြယ္ရွိသည့္ ျပႆနာမ်ားျဖစ္ေသာ လုပ္ကုိင္စားေသာက္ရန္ ေျမ၊ ေနထုိင္ရန္ေနရာ၊ သဘာ၀ရင္းျမစ္ႏွင့္အသက္ေမြး၀မ္းေၾကာင္းအခြင့္အလမ္းမ်ားျဖစ္ၿပီး အထူးသျဖင့္ ၂၀၁၂ ခုႏွစ္ NCA လက္မွတ္ ေရးထုိးၿပီးခ်ိန္မွစ၍ ယခုတုိင္ ေနရာအႏ႔ွံျဖစ္ပြားလွ်က္ရွိေသာ ေျမသိမ္းမႈအစရွိသည့္ စိန္ေခၚမႈမ်ားပင္ျဖစ္သည္။ ျပည္တြင္းေနရပ္စြန္႔ခြာရသူမ်ားစခန္းပိတ္သိမ္းေရး ႏုိင္ငံေတာ္အဆင့္စီမံကိန္းသည္ စိတ္ကူးယဥ္ဆန္ၿပီးဓမၼဓိဌာန္မက်ေပ။ ေနရပ္စြန႔ခ္ ြာရသည ့္ အဓိကအေၾကာင္းရင္းမ်ားအေပၚတြင ္ အေျခခံစဥ္းစားမမႈ ရိွေသာေၾကာင ့္စခန္းမ်ားပိတ္သိမ္းေရးသည္ ျပည္သူမ်ားအေပၚ အမွန္တကယ္ အႏၱရာယ္က်ေရာက္ေစႏိုင္ၿပီး ေနာက္တစ္ႀကိမ္ေရႊ႕ေျပာင္းရမည့္ အေျခအေနႀကံဳလာရမည္ျဖစ္သည္။ ထို႔ေၾကာင့္ မိမိတို႔မွ ေအာက္ပါအတိုင္း အႀကံျပဳတိုက္တြန္းေတာင္းဆိုအပ္ပါသည္။ ျမန္မာအစိုးရသို႔ - တိုင္းရင္းသားေဒသမ်ားတြင္ရွိေသာ ျပည္တြင္းေနရပ္စြန္႔ခြာရသူစခန္းမ်ား ပိတ္သိမ္းေရး အစီအစဥ္မ်ားအားလံုး ခ်က္ခ်င္းရပ္တန္႔ထားရန္၊
- ျပည္တြင္းေနရပ္စြန္႔ခြာရသူမ်ားႏွင့္ ပဋိပကၡ၏ဆုိးက်ိဳးသက္ေရာက္ခံအသုိင္းအဝိုင္းမ်ား၏ အခြင့္အေရးမ်ားကိုေလးစားၿပီး ျပန္လည္ေနရာခ်ထားေရးအစီအစဥ္ႏွင့္ စီမံခန္႔ခြဲမႈမ်ားအားလံုးတြင္ ၎တို႔၏ျပည့္ျပည့္ဝဝပါဝင္မႈႏွင့္ ေဆြးေႏြးညႇိႏိႈင္းတိုင္ပင္မႈမ်ားကို ေသခ်ာစြာလုပ္ေဆာင္ရန္၊
- ျပည္တြင္းေနရပ္စြန္႔ခြာရသူမ်ားအတြက္ လူသားခ်င္းစာနာမႈဆိုင္ရာအေထာက္အပံ့မ်ားအား ႏိုင္ငံတကာလူသားခ်င္းစာနာမႈဆိုင္ရာ ဥပေဒအတိုင္းရရွိႏိုင္ေရး ေသခ်ာစြာလုပ္ေဆာင္ရန္ႏွင့္ လူသားခ်င္းစာနာမႈဆိုင္ရာကူညီေထာက္ပံ့မႈမ်ား လုပ္ေဆာင္ေနေသာအဖြဲ႔အစည္းမ်ားအားလံုး သြားလာခြင့္မရေသာေနရာမ်ားသို႔ သြားေရာက္ႏိုင္ေရးအတြက္ ခြင့္ျပဳေပးရန္၊
- ေဒသခံအဖြဲ႔အစည္းမ်ား အထူးသျဖင့္ တိုင္းရင္းသားအဖြဲ႔အစည္းမ်ား၊ ၎တုိ႔၏ လုပ္ငန္းေဆာင္တာမ်ားႏွင့္၎တို႔၏ေဒသအတြင္း ျပည္တြင္းေနရပ္စြန္႔ခြာရသူမ်ားအတြက္ လူသားခ်င္းးစာနာမႈဆိုင္ရာ အေထာက္အပံ့မ်ားေပးေ၀သည့္ အခန္းက႑မ်ားကို ေလးစားအသိအမွတ္ျပဳရန္။
ျမန္မာစစ္တပ္သို႔ - တိုင္းရင္းသားေဒသမ်ားအတြင္း ထိုးစစ္ဆင္ေနမႈမ်ားအားလံုးကို ခ်က္ခ်င္းရပ္တန္႔ရန္ႏွင့္တပ္မ်ားအား ျပန္လည္ ရုပ္သိမ္းရန္၊
- ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးျဖစ္စဥ္တြင္ သေဘာထားအမွန္ျဖင့္ ပါ၀င္ျခင္းျဖင့္ ယံုၾကည္မႈကို တည္ေဆာက္ရန္၊
- ျပည္တြင္းေနရပ္စြန္႔ခြာရသူမ်ား လူသားခ်င္းစာနာမႈဆိုင္ရာ အေထာက္အပံ့မ်ားအား ႏိုင္ငံတကာလူသားခ်င္းစာနာမႈဆိုင္ရာ ဥပေဒမ်ားအတိုင္းရရွိႏိုင္ရန္ လုပ္ေဆာင္ေပးျခင္းႏွင့္ လူသားခ်င္းစာနာမႈဆိုင္ရာကူညီေထာက္ပံ့မႈမ်ား လုပ္ေဆာင္ေနေသာအဖြဲ႕အစည္းမ်ားအားလံုး သြားလာခြင့္မရေသာ ေနရာမ်ားသို႔သြားေရာက္ႏိုင္ရန္အတြက္ ခြင့္ျပဳေပးရန္။
အလုပ္အမႈေဆာင္အဖြဲ႔ အီးတူထ ျပည္တြင္းေနရပ္စြန္႔ခြာလူထုကူညီပံ့ပုိးေရးေကာ္မတီ + ၆၆ ၈၇၉ ၄၃၈၇ ၅၀ ပါ၀င္လက္မွတ္ထိုးသည့္ အဖြဲ႕အစည္းမ်ား 1. Karen Peace Support Network (KPSN) 2. Karen Women Organization (KWO) 3. Karen Refugee Committee (KRC) 4. Karen Environmental and Social Action Network (KESAN) 5. Karen Teacher Working Group (KTWG) 6. Karen Education Department (KED) 7. Karen Office of Relief and Development (KORD) 8. Karen River Watch (KRW) 9. Karen Affairs Committee (KAC) 10. Karen Human Rights Group (KHRG) 11. Karen State Civil Society Organization Network (KSCN) 12. Karen Student Network Group (KSNG) 13. Karen Youth Organization (KYO) 14. Tarkapaw Youth Group 15. Tanintharyi Friends 16. Committee for Internally Displaced Karen Peoples (CIDKP) 17. Burma Medical Association (BMA) 18. Back Pack Health Worker Team (BPHWT) 19. Mae Tao Clinic 20. Thwee Community Development Network (TCDN) 21. Hsar Mu Htaw CSO 22. Youth Circle (YC) 23. Mutraw Community Development Committee (MCDC) 24. ရြက္စိမ္းႏု သဘာဝပတ္ဝန္းက်င္ထိန္းသိမ္းေရးအဖဲြ႕ 25. Action Group for Farmer Affair (AGFA) (Ayayarwaddy Division) 26. Action Group for Farmer Affair (AGFA) (Magway Division) 27. Action Group for Farmer Affair (AGFA) (Pagu Division) 28. Action Group for Farmer Affair (AGFA) (Sagaing Division) 29. Action Group for Farmers Affair (AGFA) (Mandalay Division) 30. All Kachin Youth Union 31. Asiochin Independence force. 32. AWDO (Naphe) 33. Ayearwady west Development Organization.AWDO (Magway, 9th township) 34. Ayeyarwaddy Transparency and Accountability Association (ATTA) 35. Bedar Social Development Group 36. Belinn CSO Network 37. Candle Light 38. Chin Women Development Organization 39. Chin Youth Organization (Matupi) 40. Communiry Develovment Association 41. Green Network Mergui Archipelago 42. Htoi Gender and Development Foundation 43. Human Right Foundation of Mon Land (HURFOM) 44. K'Cho Land Development Associatuon 45. Kachin and Research Center Reply 46. Kachin Development and Networking Group (KDNG) 47. Kachin Educational Foundation (KEF) 48. Kachin State Youth Assembly 49. Kachin State Youth Association 50. Kachin Women Union (KWN) 51. Kan Chay Arr Mann fishery development network (Nga Yoke Kaung) 52. Kanpetlet Land Development Association 53. Matu Forum Committee 54. Mon Area Community Development Organization (MACDO) 55. Mon Youth Progressive Organiztion (MYPO) 56. MRJ (မာယာဂ်ာအဖြဲ႔) 57. Myeik Lawyer Network 58. NeT organization 59. Open Development Foundation 60. Peace and Justice 61. Pwinphyu Development Organization. PDO) 62. Ram Rawt (YRDO - Youth Resources Development Organisation) 63. ေစတနာ့ေ႐ွ႕ေဆာင္ လူငယ္အဖြဲ႔ 64. Saytodetayar Development Organization. (SDO) 65. Shwe Thinkha Social Development Organization 66. Southern Youth 67. Thanbyuzayart Mon Youth 68. The Seagull 69. Yomachin (saytodetaya) 70. Youth Recure (Ramhkye) 71. ကလ်ာဏမိတၲလူမႈဖြံ႔ျဖိဳးေရးအသင္း (ခင္ဦး) 72. ကေလးသူငယ္ကာကြယ္ေစာင့္ေ႐ွက္ေရး ကြန္ယက္ 73. ဂ႐ုဏာ႐ွင္ နာေရးကူညီေရးအဖြဲ႕ 74. စာျဖဴ လယ္သမားကြန္ယက္ 75. စိမ္းေရာင္စို (တံတားဦး) 76. ဇင္လြန္းေကာ္မတီ (တန္ဖရဲ႕) 77. တို႔မ်ိဳးဆက္ကြန္ရက္ 78. ဓမၼအလင္း ယဥ္ေက်းလိမၼာအဖြဲ႕ 79. ပန္းတိုင္႐ွင္အဖြဲ႔ အမ်ိဳးသမီးေက်းလက္ေဒသဖြံ႔ၿဖိဳးေရးအဖြဲ႕ 80. ပန္းတိုင္႐ွင္အဖြဲ႔ ေက်းလက္ေဒသဖြံ႔ၿဖိဳးေရးအဖြဲ႕ 81. ပ်ိဳးဥယ်ာဥ္ ပညာေရး အေထာက္အကူျပဳအဖြဲ႕ 82. မတူအမ်ိဳးသမီးဖြံ႔ျဖိဳးေရးအဖြဲ႔ 83. မုဒိတာ အဖြဲ႕ 84. ရည္ရြယ္ရာ လူမႈဖြံ႔ၿဖိဳးေရးအဖြဲ႕ 85. လင္းလက္ၾကယ္လူမွုဖြံ႔ျဖိုးေရးအဖြဲ႕ 86. လပြတၱာေတာင္သူလယ္သမားသမဂၢ 87. အနာဂတ္ၾကယ္ပြင့္ လူငယ္အဖြဲ႕ 88. အလင္းတန္းလူမူဖြံ႔ၿဖိဳးေရးအဖြဲ႔(ဘိုကေလး) 89. အလင္းမီးအိမ္ 90. အလင္းသီတံ 91. ဧရာ-သလႅာအဖြဲ႕ 92. ဧရာဝတီတိုင္းေတာင္သူလယ္သမားသမဂၢ 93. ေတာင္ပိုင္းလူငယ္ဖြံ႕ျဖိဳးအဖြဲ႕ 94. ေတာင္သူလယ္သမားသမဂၢ (ကန္႔ဘလူျမိဳ႕နယ္) 95. ေဒသဖြံ႔ၿဖိဳးေရးအဖြဲ႕ 96. ေပါင္းစည္းေမတၱာအဖြဲ႕ 97. ေျမယာႏွင့္ပတ္ဝန္းက်င္ထိန္းသိမ္း အဖဲြ႔၊ ကြတ္ခိုင္ၿမိဳ႕နယ္ 98. ေရာင္နီဦး လူမႈဖြံ႔ၿဖိဳးေရးအဖြဲ႕ 99. ေရာင္နီဦး အမ်ိဳးသမီးအဖြဲ႕ 100. ေရႊျခေသ့ၤလူမႈေစာင့္ေရွာက္ေရးအသင္း 101. ေရႊျခေသ့ၤေတာင္သူကြန္ရက္ 102. CAFT Citizen Action for Transparency 103. Generation Wave 104. MCRS Myanmar Cultural Research Society 105. Burma Monitor 106. COMREG 107. Pace on Peaceful pluralism 108. Progressive Voice ဤထုတ္ျပန္ခ်က္ကို ျမန္မာဘာသာျဖင့္ ဤေနရာတြင္ရယူပါ။ | 
